Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Constify folio_order()/folio_test_pmd_mappable()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue Jun 25, 2024 at 10:49 PM EDT, ran xiaokai wrote:
> From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Constify folio_order()/folio_test_pmd_mappable().
> No functional changes, just a preparation for the next patch.

What warning/error are you seeing when you just apply patch 2? I wonder why it
did not show up in other places. Thanks.

>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/huge_mm.h | 2 +-
>  include/linux/mm.h      | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 2aa986a5cd1b..8d66e4eaa1bc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static inline spinlock_t *pud_trans_huge_lock(pud_t *pud,
>   * folio_test_pmd_mappable - Can we map this folio with a PMD?
>   * @folio: The folio to test
>   */
> -static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
> +static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(const struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	return folio_order(folio) >= HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 9a5652c5fadd..b1c11371a2a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static inline unsigned int compound_order(struct page *page)
>   *
>   * Return: The order of the folio.
>   */
> -static inline unsigned int folio_order(struct folio *folio)
> +static inline unsigned int folio_order(const struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>  		return 0;




-- 
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux