Re: [PATCH mm-unstable] mm: folio_add_new_anon_rmap() careful __folio_set_swapbacked()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25.06.24 07:00, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Commit "mm: use folio_add_new_anon_rmap() if folio_test_anon(folio)==
false" has extended folio_add_new_anon_rmap() to use on non-exclusive
folios, already visible to others in swap cache and on LRU.

That renders its non-atomic __folio_set_swapbacked() unsafe: it risks
overwriting concurrent atomic operations on folio->flags, losing bits
added or restoring bits cleared.  Since it's only used in this risky
way when folio_test_locked and !folio_test_anon, many such races are
excluded; but, for example, isolations by folio_test_clear_lru() are
vulnerable, and setting or clearing active.

It could just use the atomic folio_set_swapbacked(); but this function
does try to avoid atomics where it can, so use a branch instead: just
avoid setting swapbacked when it is already set, that is good enough.
(Swapbacked is normally stable once set: lazyfree can undo it, but
only later, when found anon in a page table.)

This fixes a lot of instability under compaction and swapping loads:
assorted "Bad page"s, VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO()s, apparently even page double
frees - though I've not worked out what races could lead to the latter.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/rmap.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index df1a43295c85..5394c1178bf1 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1408,7 +1408,9 @@ void folio_add_new_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  	VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
  	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address < vma->vm_start ||
  			address + (nr << PAGE_SHIFT) > vma->vm_end, vma);
-	__folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
+
+	if (!folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
+		__folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
  	__folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address, exclusive);
if (likely(!folio_test_large(folio))) {

LGTM.

I'll point out that it's sufficient for a PFN walker to do a tryget + trylock to cause trouble.

Fortunately isolate_movable_page() will check __folio_test_movable() before doing the trylock.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux