On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 5:00 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit "mm: use folio_add_new_anon_rmap() if folio_test_anon(folio)==
> false" has extended folio_add_new_anon_rmap() to use on non-exclusive
> folios, already visible to others in swap cache and on LRU.
>
> That renders its non-atomic __folio_set_swapbacked() unsafe: it risks
> overwriting concurrent atomic operations on folio->flags, losing bits
> added or restoring bits cleared. Since it's only used in this risky
> way when folio_test_locked and !folio_test_anon, many such races are
> excluded; but, for example, isolations by folio_test_clear_lru() are
> vulnerable, and setting or clearing active.
>
> It could just use the atomic folio_set_swapbacked(); but this function
> does try to avoid atomics where it can, so use a branch instead: just
> avoid setting swapbacked when it is already set, that is good enough.
> (Swapbacked is normally stable once set: lazyfree can undo it, but
> only later, when found anon in a page table.)
>
> This fixes a lot of instability under compaction and swapping loads:
> assorted "Bad page"s, VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO()s, apparently even page double
> frees - though I've not worked out what races could lead to the latter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks a lot, Hugh. Sorry for my mistake. I guess we should squash this into
patch 1/3 "mm: use folio_add_new_anon_rmap() if folio_test_anon(folio) ==
false"?
Andrew, could you please help to squash this one?
> ---
> mm/rmap.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index df1a43295c85..5394c1178bf1 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1408,7 +1408,9 @@ void folio_add_new_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
> VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address < vma->vm_start ||
> address + (nr << PAGE_SHIFT) > vma->vm_end, vma);
> - __folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> +
> + if (!folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> + __folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> __folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address, exclusive);
>
> if (likely(!folio_test_large(folio))) {
> --
> 2.35.3
>
Thanks
Barry
