On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 21:18 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote: > > FWIW, I'm all for performance backports. They do have a downside though > > (other than the risk of bugs slipping in, or triggering latent bugs). > > > > When the next enterprise kernel is built, marketeers ask for numbers to > > make potential customers drool over, and you _can't produce any_ because > > you wedged all the spiffy performance stuff into the crusty old kernel. > > > Well do your job please. > > Suse 11 SP1 kernel panic on HP hardware > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/24/136 Last time I looked, handling SUSE support issues on LKML was not in my job description. I don't recall seeing anything about taking direction from random LKML subscribers either. -Mike -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>