On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:21:39PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > > On 2024/6/21 12:56, Philip Li wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2024/6/20 23:55, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > > > head: 2102cb0d050d34d50b9642a3a50861787527e922 > > > > commit: f85385e70cb4bbb569298830fdf0a3d8325de36d [6447/7105] mm: add folio_alloc_mpol() > > > > config: x86_64-randconfig-014-20240202 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240620/202406202319.pBcCfVar-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > > > > compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0 > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240620/202406202319.pBcCfVar-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) > > > > > > Hi, thanks for report, I try with gcc-13 from 0day[1], but can't > > > reproduce with above config. > > > > > > [1] https://download.01.org/0day-ci/cross-package/gcc-13.2.0-nolibc > > > > ... > > > > The above error is strange, my change shouldn't affect them. > > > > Hi Kefeng, sorry for confusion, usually you only need take care of the issue > > that is prefixed with >>, which is the new issue being introduced by the commit. > > Other issues exist due to existing commits. > > > > > > > > > | ^~~~ > > > > mm/mempolicy.c: At top level: > > > > mm/mempolicy.c:2221:14: error: redefinition of 'alloc_pages_mpol_noprof' > > > > 2221 | struct page *alloc_pages_mpol_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order, > > > > [...] > > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > | __count_vm_event > > > > mm/mempolicy.c:2272:61: error: 'NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT' undeclared (first use in this function) > > > > 2272 | __count_numa_event(page_zone(page), NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT); > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > mm/mempolicy.c: At top level: > > > > > > mm/mempolicy.c:2280:15: error: redefinition of 'folio_alloc_mpol_noprof' > > > > 2280 | struct folio *folio_alloc_mpol_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order, > > > > For this report, you can check whether this issue can be reproduced or not. > > mm/mempolicy.c:2280:15: error: redefinition of folio_alloc_mpol_noprof' > > obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += mempolicy.o > > include/linux/gfp.h:324:29: note: previous definition of > 'folio_alloc_mpol_noprof' > > but this one is under !CONFIG_NUMA, and from above config, CONFIG_NUMA > is enabled, so this should be impossible. I think you are right that this logically is impossible. Sorry that I didn't reproduce it in advance, and i also fail to reproduce. I need take deep look to understand what went wrong in the bot. Sorry for this false report. >
