Re: [GIT PULL] memblock:fix validation of NUMA coverage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 at 01:20, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A single constant is likely to backfire because I remember seeing checks
> like 'if (nid < 0)' so redefining NUMA_NO_NODE will require auditing all
> those.

Yeah, fair enough.

> But a helper function works great.

Thanks, that patch looks like a nice improvement to me.

                Linus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux