On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:27:26 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:17:31 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@xxxxxx> wrote: > > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously > > posted at [1]. > > > > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action > > are made. This patch series is about its implementation for physical > > address space so that this scheme can be applied in system wide level. > > > > Changes from RFC v4: > > https://lore.kernel.org/20240512175447.75943-1-sj@xxxxxxxxxx > > 1. Add usage and design documents > > 2. Rename alloc_demote_folio to alloc_migrate_folio > > 3. Add evaluation results with "demotion_enabled" true > > 4. Rebase based on v6.10-rc3 > > Sorry for making confusion, I didn't add "PATCH v5" tag for this patch > series so please ignore and see the resent one. Thank you for clarifying this. Nonetheless, I don't mine resetting the version number of a patchset after dropping RFC. Actually, I personally rather prefer resetting the version number. Anyway, I don't care that much. Please use any way that you feel more comfortable :) Please just keep the number monotonically increase. Thanks, SJ > > Honggyu
