On 11.06.24 21:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:06:56 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07.06.24 11:09, David Hildenbrand wrote:
In preparation for further changes, let's teach __free_pages_core()
about the differences of memory hotplug handling.
Move the memory hotplug specific handling from generic_online_page() to
__free_pages_core(), use adjust_managed_page_count() on the memory
hotplug path, and spell out why memory freed via memblock
cannot currently use adjust_managed_page_count().
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
@Andrew, can you squash the following?
Sure.
I queued it against "mm: pass meminit_context to __free_pages_core()",
not against
Subject: [PATCH] fixup: mm/highmem: make nr_free_highpages() return "unsigned
long"
Can you squash the following as well? (hopefully the last fixup, otherwise I
might just resend a v2)
From 53c8c5834e638b2ae5e2a34fa7d49ce0dcf25192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 20:31:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixup: mm: pass meminit_context to __free_pages_core()
Let's add the parameter name also in the declaration.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/internal.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 14bab8a41baf6..254dd907bf9a2 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ extern void __putback_isolated_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
extern void memblock_free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
unsigned int order);
extern void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
- enum meminit_context);
+ enum meminit_context context);
/*
* This will have no effect, other than possibly generating a warning, if the
--
2.45.2
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
