On Tue, 11 Jun 2024, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:22:03 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:06:22AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:33:17 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On 11.06.24 17:32, Andrew Bresticker wrote: > > > > > The requirement that the head page be passed to do_set_pmd() was added > > > > > in commit ef37b2ea08ac ("mm/memory: page_add_file_rmap() -> > > > > > folio_add_file_rmap_[pte|pmd]()") and prevents pmd-mapping in the > > > > > finish_fault() and filemap_map_pages() paths if the page to be inserted > > > > > is anything but the head page for an otherwise suitable vma and pmd-sized > > > > > page. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: ef37b2ea08ac ("mm/memory: page_add_file_rmap() -> folio_add_file_rmap_[pte|pmd]()") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > mm/memory.c | 3 ++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > > > > > index 0f47a533014e..a1fce5ddacb3 100644 > > > > > --- a/mm/memory.c > > > > > +++ b/mm/memory.c > > > > > @@ -4614,8 +4614,9 @@ vm_fault_t do_set_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page) > > > > > if (!thp_vma_suitable_order(vma, haddr, PMD_ORDER)) > > > > > return ret; > > > > > > > > > > - if (page != &folio->page || folio_order(folio) != HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) > > > > > + if (folio_order(folio) != HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) > > > > > return ret; > > > > > + page = &folio->page; > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > * Just backoff if any subpage of a THP is corrupted otherwise > > > > > > > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > You know what I'm going to ask ;) I'm assuming that the runtime effects > > > are "small performance optimization" and that "should we backport the > > > fix" is "no". > > > > We're going to stop using PMDs to map large folios unless the fault is > > within the first 4KiB of the PMD. No idea how many workloads that > > affects, but it only needs to be backported as far as v6.8, so we > > may as well backport it. > > OK, thanks, I pasted the above text and added the cc:stable. Yes please. My interest in this being that yesterday I discovered the large drop in ShmemPmdMapped between v6.7 and v6.8, bisected, and was testing overnight with a patch very much like this one of Andrew's. I'd been hoping to send mine today, but now no need. > > I didn't move it into the hotfixes queue - it's a non-trivial > behavioral change and extra test time seems prudent(?). It is certainly worth some test soak time, and the bug might have been masking other issues which may now emerge; but the fix is just reverting to the old pre-v6.8 behaviour. Thanks, Hugh