Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] mm/memory-failure: simplify put_ref_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2024/6/6 14:32, Miaohe Lin wrote:
Remove unneeded page != NULL check. pfn_to_page() won't return NULL.
No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/memory-failure.c | 6 +-----
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index f679b579d45d..2e6038c73119 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2120,14 +2120,10 @@ static inline unsigned long folio_free_raw_hwp(struct folio *folio, bool flag)
  /* Drop the extra refcount in case we come from madvise() */
  static void put_ref_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)

Since all calllers have a valid page,better to pass the page instead of pfn?

  {
-	struct page *page;
-
  	if (!(flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED))
  		return;
- page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
-	if (page)
-		put_page(page);
+	put_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
  }
static int memory_failure_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn, int flags,




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux