Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>于2024年6月5日 周三19:16写道：
hi, Yang Shi,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 04:53:56PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 9:54 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 7:02 AM Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > hi, Yang Shi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:57:06PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > > Hi Oliver,
> > > >
> > > > I just came up with a quick patch (just build test) per the discussion
> > > > and attached, can you please to give it a try? Once it is verified, I
> > > > will refine the patch and submit for review.
> > >
> > > what's the base of this patch? I tried to apply it upon efa7df3e3b or
> > > v6.10-rc2. both failed.
> >
> > Its base is mm-unstable. The head commit is 8e06d6b9274d ("mm: add
> > swappiness= arg to memory.reclaim"). Sorry for the confusion, I should
> > have mentioned this.
>
> I just figured out a bug in the patch. Anyway, we are going to take a
> different approach to fix the issue per the discussion. I already sent
> the series to the mailing list. Please refer to
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240604234858.948986-1-yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
got it. seems you will submit v2? should we wait v2 to do the tests?
The real fix is patch #1, that doesn’t need v2. So you just need to test that.
For patch #2, I haven’t received any comment yet and I’m going to travel so I’m not going to submit v2 soon .
And I heard if hugepd is going to be gone soon, so I may wait for that then rebase on top of it. Anyway it is just a clean up.
sorry that due to resource constraint, we cannot respond test request very
quickly now.
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Yang
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > David / dhildenb
> > > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
