On 5/31/24 8:57 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > __kmalloc_node() is considered an "internal" function to the Slab, so > drop it from explicit testing. So is __kmalloc() and so I have the removal of both as part of the cleanup here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240527090127.21979-2-vbabka@xxxxxxx/ which reminds me I should put it to -next at this point. Review still welcome :) > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > lib/fortify_kunit.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/fortify_kunit.c b/lib/fortify_kunit.c > index 39da5b3bc649..f9cc467334ce 100644 > --- a/lib/fortify_kunit.c > +++ b/lib/fortify_kunit.c > @@ -235,9 +235,6 @@ static void fortify_test_alloc_size_##allocator##_dynamic(struct kunit *test) \ > kmalloc_array_node(alloc_size, 1, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE), \ > kfree(p)); \ > checker(expected_size, __kmalloc(alloc_size, gfp), \ > - kfree(p)); \ > - checker(expected_size, \ > - __kmalloc_node(alloc_size, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE), \ > kfree(p)); \ > \ > orig = kmalloc(alloc_size, gfp); \
