Completely agree with David's point[1]. I'm also not convinced that this is the right approach :) It seems like this patch won't handle all cases, as David mentioned[1] before. folio_remove_rmap_ptes() will immediately munlock a large folio (as large folios are not allowed to be batch-added to the LRU list) via munlock_vma_folio() when it is fully unmapped, so this patch does not work in this case. Even worse, if we encounter a COW mlocked folio, we would run into trouble (data corruption). Hi Andrew, I just noticed that this patch has become part of v6.10-rc1, but it has not been acked/reviewed yet. Is there any chance to revert it? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/8118eabf-de9c-41a7-9892-3a1a5bd2071c@xxxxxxxxxx/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240517192239.9285edd85f8ef893bb508a61@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks, Lance