On Mon, 27 May 2024, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:43:08PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 27 May 2024, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:13:40AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 27 May 2024, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > one bit from LSF/MM discussions is that there might be call_rcu users with a
> > > > > callback that only does a kmem_cache_free() to a specific cache. Since SLOB
> > > > > was removed, it's always ok to use kfree() and thus also kfree_rcu() on
> > > > > allocations from kmem_cache_alloc() in addition to kmalloc(). Thus, such
> > > > > call_rcu() users might be simplified to kfree_rcu(). I found some cases
> > > > > semi-manually, but I'd expect coccinelle could help here so if anyone wants
> > > > > to take this task, feel free to.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the suggestion! I will try to look into it.
> > >
> > > Thank you both!
> >
> > I found the following functions. Do you want some other information, such
> > as where they are called from?
>
> Thank you!
>
> > Ignore the -s at the beginning of some lines. Those are for emphasis. not
> > to suggest to remove the code.
>
> Well, the idea is to remove not only those lines, but the functions
> containing them as well. ;-)
>
> Then each call_rcu() function becomes kfree_rcu().
OK. I'll send a patch for your review accordingly. If everything looks
fine, I will send the patches to the maintainers.
julia
>
> > I checked that the functions are only used in calls to call_rcu.
>
> Good point, I had forgotten about that possibility!
>
> > Without more effort, Coccinelle only looks for functions defined in the
> > same file. Here are the functions that are passed to call_rcu where the
> > function is not defined in the same file:
> >
> > need definition for audit_free_rule_rcu
> > need definition for __i915_gem_free_object_rcu
> > need definition for io_eventfd_ops
> > need definition for ip_vs_dest_dst_rcu_free
> > need definition for __put_task_struct_rcu_cb
> > need definition for radix_tree_node_rcu_free
> >
> > They all do something more, although radix_tree_node_rcu_free doesn't do
> > much more (some memsets).
>
> Those might be important in order to handle the possibility of readers
> holding a reference to a given block of memory across the time that it
> is freed and then reallocated, but I cannot say for sure.
>
> In most cases, the reinitialization at reallocation time suffices.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > julia
> >
> > diff -u -p /home/jll/linux/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c /tmp/nothing/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
> > --- /home/jll/linux/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
> > @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ static void push_rcu(struct allowedips_n
> >
> > static void node_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> > {
> > - kmem_cache_free(node_cache, container_of(rcu, struct allowedips_node, rcu));
> > }
> >
> > static void root_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> > diff -u -p /home/jll/linux/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c /tmp/nothing/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c
> > --- /home/jll/linux/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c
> > @@ -53,8 +53,6 @@ struct kmem_cache *ecryptfs_dentry_info_
> >
> > static void ecryptfs_dentry_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> > {
> > - kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_dentry_info_cache,
> > - container_of(head, struct ecryptfs_dentry_info, rcu));
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > diff -u -p /home/jll/linux/kernel/fork.c /tmp/nothing/kernel/fork.c
> > --- /home/jll/linux/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -378,7 +378,6 @@ static struct kmem_cache *thread_stack_c
> >
> > static void thread_stack_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rh)
> > {
> > - kmem_cache_free(thread_stack_cache, rh);
> > }
> >
> > static void thread_stack_delayed_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > diff -u -p /home/jll/linux/kernel/workqueue.c /tmp/nothing/kernel/workqueue.c
> > --- /home/jll/linux/kernel/workqueue.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing/kernel/workqueue.c
> > @@ -5024,8 +5024,6 @@ fail:
> >
> > static void rcu_free_pwq(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> > {
> > - kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache,
> > - container_of(rcu, struct pool_workqueue, rcu));
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > diff -u -p /home/jll/linux/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c /tmp/nothing/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
> > --- /home/jll/linux/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
> > @@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ static struct inet_peer *lookup(const st
> >
> > static void inetpeer_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> > {
> > - kmem_cache_free(peer_cachep, container_of(head, struct inet_peer, rcu));
> > }
> >
> > /* perform garbage collect on all items stacked during a lookup */
> > diff -u -p /home/jll/linux/net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c /tmp/nothing/net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c
> > --- /home/jll/linux/net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing/net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c
> > @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm6_tunnel_alloc_spi);
> >
> > static void x6spi_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> > {
> > - kmem_cache_free(xfrm6_tunnel_spi_kmem,
> > - container_of(head, struct xfrm6_tunnel_spi, rcu_head));
> > }
> >
> > static void xfrm6_tunnel_free_spi(struct net *net, xfrm_address_t *saddr)
> > diff -u -p /home/jll/linux/security/security.c /tmp/nothing/security/security.c
> > --- /home/jll/linux/security/security.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing/security/security.c
> > @@ -1599,7 +1599,6 @@ static void inode_free_by_rcu(struct rcu
> > /*
> > * The rcu head is at the start of the inode blob
> > */
> > - kmem_cache_free(lsm_inode_cache, head);
> > }
> >
> > /**
>
