Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: remove {Set,Clear}Hpage macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/20/24 4:30 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 03:44:07PM -0700, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
All users have been converted to use the folio version of these macros,
we can safely remove the page based interface.

Yay!

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



There is only one remaining user of page-based Test version of these macros.

in mm/memory-hotplug.c:

		if (!PageHuge(page))
			continue;
		head = compound_head(page);
		/*
		 * This test is racy as we hold no reference or lock.  The
		 * hugetlb page could have been free'ed and head is no longer
		 * a hugetlb page before the following check.  In such unlikely
		 * cases false positives and negatives are possible.  Calling
		 * code must deal with these scenarios.
		 */
		if (HPageMigratable(head))
			goto found;
		skip = compound_nr(head) - (pfn - page_to_pfn(head));


I've previously sent a patch to convert this to folios[1] but got feedback that it was unsafe. But I'm not sure why replacing compound_head() with page_folio() and using folio_test_hugetlb_migratable(folio) rather than HPageMigratable(head) changes the existing behavior. With no reference or lock, can't the head pointer also be moved and no longer be a part of page like the comment states. So would the folio conversion just be maintaining this level of existing un-safety that the calling code should handle anyways?



[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y89DK23hYiLtgGNk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#mb3a339b98386b1cd0b87f94f45163756ebd7feaa




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux