On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:19:06AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:08:28PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:12:18AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > > This is where the mm_autonuma structure is being handled. Just like > > > > > sched_autonuma, this is only allocated at runtime if the hardware the > > > > > kernel is running on has been detected as NUMA. On not NUMA hardware > > > > > > > > I think the correct wording is "non-NUMA", not "not NUMA". > > > > > > That sounds far too easy to me, but I've no idea what's the right is here. > > > > UMA? > > > > Single-node hardware? > > Lets be simple and stay with non-NUMA. Ok, I already corrected all occurrences. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>