Re: [PATCH 00/13] rbtree updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 18:12 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>>
>> In __rb_erase_color(), some of the cases are more complicated than you drew however, because some node colors aren't known.
>
> Right, the wikipedia article draws them blank, I couldn't come up with a
> 3rd case, although maybe we can annotate them like (P) to mean blank..

Ah, good idea, I adopted that :)

> Yes, very nice.. someday when I'm bored I might expand the comments with
> the reason why we're doing the given operation.

There is a brief comment at the start of the loop that indicates which
rbtree invariants might be violated at that point; so someone could
deduce that we're trying to either fix these or move towards the root
until they get fixed. But yeah, this is never explicitly explained.

> Also, I was sorely tempted to rename your tmp1,tmp2 variables to sl and
> sr.

This could be done, but you'd *still* need one extra temporary, so
you'd end up with sl, sr and tmp. Which is fine, I guess, but I
preferred to have one less variable around.

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]