On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:05:01 +0200 > Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > When we are back to the patch. Is it going into 3.5? I hope so and I > > think it is really worth stable as well. Andrew? > > What patch. "memcg: prevent OOM with too many dirty pages"? Yes. > > I wasn't planning on 3.5, given the way it's been churning around. I don't know if you had been intending to send it in for 3.5 earlier; but I'm sorry if my late intervention on may_enter_fs has delayed it. > How > about we put it into 3.6 and tag it for a -stable backport, so it gets > a bit of a run in mainline before we inflict it upon -stable users? That sounds good enough to me, but does fall short of Michal's hope. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>