On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 02:54:51PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Byungchul Park <byungchul@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > While I'm working with a tiered memory system e.g. CXL memory, I have
> > been facing migration overhead esp. tlb shootdown on promotion or
> > demotion between different tiers. Yeah.. most tlb shootdowns on
> > migration through hinting fault can be avoided thanks to Huang Ying's
> > work, commit 4d4b6d66db ("mm,unmap: avoid flushing tlb in batch if PTE
> > is inaccessible"). See the following link for more information:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231115025755.GA29979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > However, it's only for migration through hinting fault. I thought it'd
> > be much better if we have a general mechanism to reduce all the tlb
> > numbers that we can apply to any unmap code, that we normally believe
> > tlb flush should be followed.
> >
> > I'm suggesting a new mechanism, LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush), defers tlb flush
> > until folios that have been unmapped and freed, eventually get allocated
> > again. It's safe for folios that had been mapped read-only and were
> > unmapped, since the contents of the folios don't change while staying in
> > pcp or buddy so we can still read the data through the stale tlb entries.
> >
> > tlb flush can be defered when folios get unmapped as long as it
> > guarantees to perform tlb flush needed, before the folios actually
> > become used, of course, only if all the corresponding ptes don't have
> > write permission. Otherwise, the system will get messed up.
> >
> > To achieve that:
> >
> > 1. For the folios that map only to non-writable tlb entries, prevent
> > tlb flush during unmapping but perform it just before the folios
> > actually become used, out of buddy or pcp.
> >
> > 2. When any non-writable ptes change to writable e.g. through fault
> > handler, give up luf mechanism and perform tlb flush required
> > right away.
> >
> > 3. When a writable mapping is created e.g. through mmap(), give up
> > luf mechanism and perform tlb flush required right away.
> >
> > No matter what type of workload is used for performance evaluation, the
> > result would be positive thanks to the unconditional reduction of tlb
> > flushes, tlb misses and interrupts.
>
> Are there any downsides of the optimization? Will it cause regression
> for workloads with almost no read-only mappings? Will it cause
IMHO, no. LUF does almost nothing for folios writable mapped.
> regression for page allocation?
TLB flush might be added in prep_new_page() if pended, however, that
should have been already performed anyway. It's not additional overhead.
The TLB flush even can be skipped by the batched work.
> > For the test, I picked up one of
> > the most popular and heavy workload, llama.cpp that is a
> > LLM(Large Language Model) inference engine.
>
> IIUC, llama.cpp is a workload with huge read-only mapping.
Right. LUF works on read-only mapping. So the more read-only mappings
are used, the better LUF works. Fortunately, such a workload with huge
read-only mappings that is normal in a light weight inference engine, is
quite popular these days in the era of LLM.
Byungchul
> > The result would depend on memory latency and how often reclaim runs,
> > which implies tlb miss overhead and how many times unmapping happens.
> > In my system, the result shows:
> >
> > 1. tlb flushes are reduced about 95%.
> > 2. tlb misses(itlb) are reduced about 80%.
> > 3. tlb misses(dtlb store) are reduced about 57%.
> > 4. tlb misses(dtlb load) are reduced about 24%.
> > 5. tlb shootdown interrupts are reduced about 95%.
> > 6. The test program runtime is reduced about 5%.
> >
> > The test environment and the result is like:
> >
> > Machine: bare metal, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6430
> > CPU: 1 socket 64 core with hyper thread on
> > Numa: 2 nodes (64 CPUs DRAM 42GB, no CPUs CXL expander 98GB)
> > Config: swap off, numa balancing tiering on, demotion enabled
> >
> > The test set:
> >
> > llama.cpp/main -m $(70G_model1) -p "who are you?" -s 1 -t 15 -n 20 &
> > llama.cpp/main -m $(70G_model2) -p "who are you?" -s 1 -t 15 -n 20 &
> > llama.cpp/main -m $(70G_model3) -p "who are you?" -s 1 -t 15 -n 20 &
> > wait
> >
> > where -t: nr of threads, -s: seed used to make the runtime stable,
> > -n: nr of tokens that determines the runtime, -p: prompt to ask,
> > -m: LLM model to use.
> >
> > Run the test set 10 times successively with caches dropped every run
> > via 'echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'. Each inference prints its
> > runtime at the end of each.
> >
> > 1. Runtime from the output of llama.cpp:
> >
> > BEFORE
> > ------
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1002461.95 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1044978.38 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1000653.09 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1047104.80 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1069430.36 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1068201.16 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1078092.59 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1073200.45 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1067136.00 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1076442.56 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1004142.64 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1042942.65 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 999933.76 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1046548.83 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1068671.48 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1068285.76 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1077789.63 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1071558.93 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1066181.55 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1076767.53 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1004065.63 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1044522.13 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 999725.33 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1047510.77 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1068010.27 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1068999.31 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1077648.05 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1071378.96 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1066326.32 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1077088.92 ms / 24 tokens
> >
> > AFTER
> > -----
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 988522.03 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 997204.52 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 996605.86 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 991985.50 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1035143.31 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 993660.18 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 983082.14 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 990431.36 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 992707.09 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 992673.27 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 989285.43 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 996710.06 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 996534.64 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 991344.17 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1035210.84 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 994714.13 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 984184.15 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 990909.45 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 991881.48 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 993918.03 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 990061.34 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 998076.69 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 997082.59 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 990677.58 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 1036054.94 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 994125.93 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 982467.01 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 990191.60 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 993319.24 ms / 24 tokens
> > llama_print_timings: total time = 992540.57 ms / 24 tokens
> >
> > 2. tlb shootdowns from 'cat /proc/interrupts':
> >
> > BEFORE
> > ------
> > TLB:
> > 125553646 141418810 161932620 176853972 186655697 190399283
> > 192143823 196414038 192872439 193313658 193395617 192521416
> > 190788161 195067598 198016061 193607347 194293972 190786732
> > 191545637 194856822 191801931 189634535 190399803 196365922
> > 195268398 190115840 188050050 193194908 195317617 190820190
> > 190164820 185556071 226797214 229592631 216112464 209909495
> > 205575979 205950252 204948111 197999795 198892232 205287952
> > 199344631 195015158 195869844 198858745 195692876 200961904
> > 203463252 205921722 199850838 206145986 199613202 199961345
> > 200129577 203020521 207873649 203697671 197093386 204243803
> > 205993323 200934664 204193128 194435376 TLB shootdowns
> >
> > AFTER
> > -----
> > TLB:
> > 5648092 6610142 7032849 7882308 8088518 8352310
> > 8656536 8705136 8647426 8905583 8985408 8704522
> > 8884344 9026261 8929974 8869066 8877575 8810096
> > 8770984 8754503 8801694 8865925 8787524 8656432
> > 8755912 8682034 8773935 8832925 8797997 8515777
> > 8481240 8891258 10595243 10285973 9756935 9573681
> > 9398968 9069244 9242984 8899009 9310690 9029095
> > 9069758 9105825 9092703 9270202 9460287 9258546
> > 9180415 9232723 9270611 9175020 9490420 9360316
> > 9420818 9057663 9525631 9310152 9152242 8654483
> > 9181804 9050847 8919916 8883856 TLB shootdowns
> >
> > 3. tlb numbers from 'perf stat' per test set:
> >
> > BEFORE
> > ------
> > 3163679332 dTLB-load-misses
> > 2017751856 dTLB-store-misses
> > 327092903 iTLB-load-misses
> > 1357543886 tlb:tlb_flush
> >
> > AFTER
> > -----
> > 2394694609 dTLB-load-misses
> > 861144167 dTLB-store-misses
> > 64055579 iTLB-load-misses
> > 69175002 tlb:tlb_flush
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes from v9:
> >
> > 1. Expand the candidate to apply this mechanism:
> >
> > BEFORE - The souce folios at any type of migration.
> > AFTER - Any folios that have been unmapped and freed.
> >
> > 2. Change the workload for test:
> >
> > BEFORE - XSBench
> > AFTER - llama.cpp (one of the most popluar real workload)
> >
> > 3. Change the test environment:
> >
> > BEFORE - qemu machine, too small DRAM(1GB), large remote mem
> > AFTER - bare metal, real CXL memory, practical memory size
> >
> > 4. Rename the mechanism from MIGRC(Migration Read Copy) to
> > LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) to reflect the current version of the
> > mechanism can be applied not only to unmap during migration
> > but any unmap code e.g. unmap in shrink_folio_list().
> >
> > 5. Fix build error for riscv. (feedbacked by kernel test bot)
> >
> > 6. Supplement commit messages to describe what this mechanism is
> > for, especially in the patches for arch code. (feedbacked by
> > Thomas Gleixner)
> >
> > 7. Clean up some trivial things.
> >
> > Changes from v8:
> >
> > 1. Rebase on akpm/mm.git mm-unstable as of April 18, 2024.
> > 2. Supplement comments and commit message.
> > 3. Change the candidate to apply migrc mechanism:
> >
> > BEFORE - The source folios at demotion and promotion.
> > AFTER - The souce folios at any type of migration.
> >
> > 4. Change how migrc mechanism works:
> >
> > BEFORE - Reduce tlb flushes by deferring folio_free() for
> > source folios during demotion and promotion.
> > AFTER - Reduce tlb flushes by deferring tlb flush until they
> > actually become used, out of pcp or buddy. The
> > current version of migrc does *not* defer calling
> > folio_free() but let it go as it is as the same as
> > vanilla kernel, with the folios marked kind of 'need
> > to tlb flush'. And then handle the flush when the
> > page exits from pcp or buddy so as to prevent
> > changing vm stats e.g. free pages.
> >
> > Changes from v7:
> >
> > 1. Rewrite cover letter to explain what 'migrc' mechasism is.
> > (feedbacked by Andrew Morton)
> > 2. Supplement the commit message of a patch 'mm: Add APIs to
> > free a folio directly to the buddy bypassing pcp'.
> > (feedbacked by Andrew Morton)
> >
> > Changes from v6:
> >
> > 1. Fix build errors in case of
> > CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_tlb_FLUSH disabled by moving
> > migrc_flush_{start,end}() calls from arch code to
> > try_to_unmap_flush() in mm/rmap.c.
> >
> > Changes from v5:
> >
> > 1. Fix build errors in case of CONFIG_MIGRATION disabled or
> > CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT moduled. (feedbacked by kernel test
> > bot and Raymond Jay Golo)
> > 2. Organize migrc code with two kconfigs, CONFIG_MIGRATION and
> > CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_tlb_FLUSH.
> >
> > Changes from v4:
> >
> > 1. Rebase on v6.7.
> > 2. Fix build errors in arm64 that is doing nothing for tlb flush
> > but has CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_tlb_FLUSH. (reported
> > by kernel test robot)
> > 3. Don't use any page flag. So the system would give up migrc
> > mechanism more often but it's okay. The final improvement is
> > good enough.
> > 4. Instead, optimize full tlb flush(arch_tlbbatch_flush()) by
> > avoiding redundant CPUs from tlb flush.
> >
> > Changes from v3:
> >
> > 1. Don't use the kconfig, CONFIG_MIGRC, and remove sysctl knob,
> > migrc_enable. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 2. Remove the optimization skipping CPUs that have already
> > performed tlb flushes needed by any reason when performing
> > tlb flushes by migrc because I can't tell the performance
> > difference between w/ the optimization and w/o that.
> > (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 3. Minimize arch-specific code. While at it, move all the migrc
> > declarations and inline functions from include/linux/mm.h to
> > mm/internal.h (feedbacked by Dave Hansen, Nadav)
> > 4. Separate a part making migrc paused when the system is in
> > high memory pressure to another patch. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 5. Rename:
> > a. arch_tlbbatch_clean() to arch_tlbbatch_clear(),
> > b. tlb_ubc_nowr to tlb_ubc_ro,
> > c. migrc_try_flush_free_folios() to migrc_flush_free_folios(),
> > d. migrc_stop to migrc_pause.
> > (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 6. Use ->lru list_head instead of introducing a new llist_head.
> > (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 7. Use non-atomic operations of page-flag when it's safe.
> > (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 8. Use stack instead of keeping a pointer of 'struct migrc_req'
> > in struct task, which is for manipulating it locally.
> > (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 9. Replace a lot of simple functions to inline functions placed
> > in a header, mm/internal.h. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 10. Add additional sufficient comments. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> > 11. Remove a lot of wrapper functions. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> >
> > Changes from RFC v2:
> >
> > 1. Remove additional occupation in struct page. To do that,
> > unioned with lru field for migrc's list and added a page
> > flag. I know page flag is a thing that we don't like to add
> > but no choice because migrc should distinguish folios under
> > migrc's control from others. Instead, I force migrc to be
> > used only on 64 bit system to mitigate you guys from getting
> > angry.
> > 2. Remove meaningless internal object allocator that I
> > introduced to minimize impact onto the system. However, a ton
> > of tests showed there was no difference.
> > 3. Stop migrc from working when the system is in high memory
> > pressure like about to perform direct reclaim. At the
> > condition where the swap mechanism is heavily used, I found
> > the system suffered from regression without this control.
> > 4. Exclude folios that pte_dirty() == true from migrc's interest
> > so that migrc can work simpler.
> > 5. Combine several patches that work tightly coupled to one.
> > 6. Add sufficient comments for better review.
> > 7. Manage migrc's request in per-node manner (from globally).
> > 8. Add tlb miss improvement in commit message.
> > 9. Test with more CPUs(4 -> 16) to see bigger improvement.
> >
> > Changes from RFC:
> >
> > 1. Fix a bug triggered when a destination folio at the previous
> > migration becomes a source folio at the next migration,
> > before the folio gets handled properly so that the folio can
> > play with another migration. There was inconsistency in the
> > folio's state. Fixed it.
> > 2. Split the patch set into more pieces so that the folks can
> > review better. (Feedbacked by Nadav Amit)
> > 3. Fix a wrong usage of barrier e.g. smp_mb__after_atomic().
> > (Feedbacked by Nadav Amit)
> > 4. Tried to add sufficient comments to explain the patch set
> > better. (Feedbacked by Nadav Amit)
> >
> > Byungchul Park (12):
> > x86/tlb: add APIs manipulating tlb batch's arch data
> > arm64: tlbflush: add APIs manipulating tlb batch's arch data
> > riscv, tlb: add APIs manipulating tlb batch's arch data
> > x86/tlb, riscv/tlb, mm/rmap: separate arch_tlbbatch_clear() out of
> > arch_tlbbatch_flush()
> > mm: buddy: make room for a new variable, ugen, in struct page
> > mm: add folio_put_ugen() to deliver unmap generation number to pcp or
> > buddy
> > mm: add a parameter, unmap generation number, to free_unref_folios()
> > mm/rmap: recognize read-only tlb entries during batched tlb flush
> > mm: implement LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) defering tlb flush when folios get
> > unmapped
> > mm: separate move/undo parts from migrate_pages_batch()
> > mm, migrate: apply luf mechanism to unmapping during migration
> > mm, vmscan: apply luf mechanism to unmapping during folio reclaim
> >
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 18 ++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 21 ++
> > arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c | 1 -
> > arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 18 ++
> > arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 2 -
> > include/linux/mm.h | 22 ++
> > include/linux/mm_types.h | 40 +++-
> > include/linux/rmap.h | 7 +-
> > include/linux/sched.h | 11 +
> > mm/compaction.c | 10 +
> > mm/internal.h | 115 +++++++++-
> > mm/memory.c | 8 +
> > mm/migrate.c | 184 ++++++++++------
> > mm/mmap.c | 8 +
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 157 +++++++++++---
> > mm/page_isolation.c | 6 +
> > mm/page_reporting.c | 10 +
> > mm/rmap.c | 345 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > mm/swap.c | 18 +-
> > mm/vmscan.c | 29 ++-
> > 20 files changed, 904 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > base-commit: f52bcd4a9f6058704a6f6b6b50418f579defd4fe
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
