On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:24:05AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > I think you are better using a different name. > > Perhaps 'if (autonuma_on())' I changed it to AUTONUMA_POSSIBLE_FLAG/autonuma_possible() and optimized the implementation to a single test_bit on the read mostly flag variable. "possible" is the term all NUMA code in the kernel already uses with almost the same meaning (modulo noautonuma parameter) as num_possible_nodes() etc... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>