Re: [PATCH v3 10/29] riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 04:34:58PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> `arch_calc_vm_prot_bits` is implemented on risc-v to return VM_READ |
> VM_WRITE if PROT_WRITE is specified. Similarly `riscv_sys_mmap` is
> updated to convert all incoming PROT_WRITE to (PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ).
> This is to make sure that any existing apps using PROT_WRITE still work.
> 
> Earlier `protection_map[VM_WRITE]` used to pick read-write PTE encodings.
> Now `protection_map[VM_WRITE]` will always pick PAGE_SHADOWSTACK PTE
> encodings for shadow stack. Above changes ensure that existing apps
> continue to work because underneath kernel will be picking
> `protection_map[VM_WRITE|VM_READ]` PTE encodings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h    | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h |  1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c    | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/mm/init.c             |  2 +-
>  mm/mmap.c                        |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ef9fedf32546
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __ASM_MMAN_H__
> +#define __ASM_MMAN_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <uapi/asm/mman.h>
> +
> +static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot,
> +	unsigned long pkey __always_unused)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ret = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If PROT_WRITE was specified, force it to VM_READ | VM_WRITE.
> +	 * Only VM_WRITE means shadow stack.
> +	 */
> +	if (prot & PROT_WRITE)
> +		ret = (VM_READ | VM_WRITE);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +#define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey) arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey)
> +
> +#endif /* ! __ASM_MMAN_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 6066822e7396..4d5983bc6766 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ extern struct pt_alloc_ops pt_ops __initdata;
>  #define PAGE_READ_EXEC		__pgprot(_PAGE_BASE | _PAGE_READ | _PAGE_EXEC)
>  #define PAGE_WRITE_EXEC		__pgprot(_PAGE_BASE | _PAGE_READ |	\
>  					 _PAGE_EXEC | _PAGE_WRITE)
> +#define PAGE_SHADOWSTACK       __pgprot(_PAGE_BASE | _PAGE_WRITE)
>  
>  #define PAGE_COPY		PAGE_READ
>  #define PAGE_COPY_EXEC		PAGE_READ_EXEC
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
> index f1c1416a9f1e..846c36b1b3d5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>  #include <asm-generic/mman-common.h>
> +#include <vdso/vsyscall.h>
> +#include <asm/mman.h>
>  
>  static long riscv_sys_mmap(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>  			   unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags,
> @@ -17,6 +19,15 @@ static long riscv_sys_mmap(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>  	if (unlikely(offset & (~PAGE_MASK >> page_shift_offset)))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If only PROT_WRITE is specified then extend that to PROT_READ
> +	 * protection_map[VM_WRITE] is now going to select shadow stack encodings.
> +	 * So specifying PROT_WRITE actually should select protection_map [VM_WRITE | VM_READ]
> +	 * If user wants to create shadow stack then they should use `map_shadow_stack` syscall.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely((prot & PROT_WRITE) && !(prot & PROT_READ)))

The comments says that this should extend to PROT_READ if only
PROT_WRITE is specified. This condition instead is checking if
PROT_WRITE is selected but PROT_READ is not. If prot is (VM_EXEC |
VM_WRITE) then it would be extended to (VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE | VM_READ).
This will not currently cause any issues because these both map to the
same value in the protection_map PAGE_COPY_EXEC, however this seems to
be not the intention of this change.

prot == PROT_WRITE better suits the condition explained in the comment.

> +		prot |= PROT_READ;
> +
>  	return ksys_mmap_pgoff(addr, len, prot, flags, fd,
>  			       offset >> (PAGE_SHIFT - page_shift_offset));
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index fa34cf55037b..98e5ece4052a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ pgd_t early_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD] __initdata __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
>  static const pgprot_t protection_map[16] = {
>  	[VM_NONE]					= PAGE_NONE,
>  	[VM_READ]					= PAGE_READ,
> -	[VM_WRITE]					= PAGE_COPY,
> +	[VM_WRITE]					= PAGE_SHADOWSTACK,
>  	[VM_WRITE | VM_READ]				= PAGE_COPY,
>  	[VM_EXEC]					= PAGE_EXEC,
>  	[VM_EXEC | VM_READ]				= PAGE_READ_EXEC,
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index d89770eaab6b..57a974f49b00 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/ksm.h>
> +#include <linux/processor.h>

It doesn't seem like this is necessary for this patch.

- Charlie

>  
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> -- 
> 2.43.2
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux