Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/8/2024 7:54 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote:

On 2024/5/2 7:24, Jane Chu wrote:
For years when it comes down to kill a process due to hwpoison,
a SIGBUS is delivered only if unmap has been successful.
Otherwise, a SIGKILL is delivered. And the reason for that is
to prevent the involved process from accessing the hwpoisoned
page again.

Since then a lot has changed, a hwpoisoned page is marked and
upon being re-accessed, the process will be killed immediately.
So let's take out the '!unmap_success' factor and try to deliver
SIGBUS if possible.

Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ++++---------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 9e62a00b46dd..7fcf182abb96 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -519,19 +519,14 @@ void add_to_kill_ksm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
   * Also when FAIL is set do a force kill because something went
   * wrong earlier.
   */
-static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, bool fail,
+static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill,
  		unsigned long pfn, int flags)
  {
  	struct to_kill *tk, *next;
list_for_each_entry_safe(tk, next, to_kill, nd) {
  		if (forcekill) {
-			/*
-			 * In case something went wrong with munmapping
-			 * make sure the process doesn't catch the
-			 * signal and then access the memory. Just kill it.
-			 */
-			if (fail || tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
+			if (tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
  				pr_err("%#lx: forcibly killing %s:%d because of failure to unmap corrupted page\n",
  				       pfn, tk->tsk->comm, tk->tsk->pid);
  				do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV,
@@ -1666,7 +1661,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn,
  	 */
There is comment above the forcekill saying:

     When there was a problem unmapping earlier use a more force-full
uncatchable kill to prevent any accesses to the poisoned memory.

This might need to be changed too.

Yes, will do.

thanks!

-jane

Thanks.
.

  	forcekill = PageDirty(hpage) || (flags & MF_MUST_KILL) ||
  		    !unmap_success;
-	kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, !unmap_success, pfn, flags);
+	kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, pfn, flags);
return unmap_success;
  }
@@ -1730,7 +1725,7 @@ static void unmap_and_kill(struct list_head *to_kill, unsigned long pfn,
  		unmap_mapping_range(mapping, start, size, 0);
  	}
- kill_procs(to_kill, flags & MF_MUST_KILL, false, pfn, flags);
+	kill_procs(to_kill, flags & MF_MUST_KILL, pfn, flags);
  }
/*






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux