On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:37:06PM -0700, Chris Li wrote: > Either way works. It will produce the same machine code. I have a > slight inclination to just drop swap_free(entry) API so that it > discourages the caller to do a for loop over swap_free(). Then just ad the number of entries parameter to swap_free and do away with the separate swap_free_nr.