On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Revert 4fb5ef089b28 ("tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE").
> > I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from rc1 to rc6;
> > but as the original commit said:
> >
> > I don't know who actually uses SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, and whether it
> > would be of any use to them on tmpfs. This code adds 92 lines and 752
> > bytes on x86_64 - is that bloat or worthwhile?
>
>
> I don't think 752 bytes matter much, especially for x86_64.
>
> >
> > Nobody asked for it, so I conclude that it's bloat: let's revert tmpfs
> > to the dumb generic support for v3.5. We can always reinstate it later
> > if useful, and anyone needing it in a hurry can just get it out of git.
> >
>
> If you don't have burden to maintain it, I'd prefer to leave as it is,
> I don't think 752-bytes is the reason we revert it.
Thank you, your vote has been counted ;)
and I'll be glad if yours stimulates some agreement or disagreement.
But your vote would count for a lot more if you know of some app which
would really benefit from this functionality in tmpfs: I've heard of none.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>