Re: [linux-next:master 10455/10463] include/linux/blkdev.h:733:(.text+0x260): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR1'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 03:31:26PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head:   9c6ecb3cb6e20c4fd7997047213ba0efcf9ada1a
> commit: 5070493a645c67e42b3e86b5cad9796e831281dc [10455/10463] Merge branch 'sysctl-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sysctl/sysctl.git
> config: riscv-randconfig-c023-20221031 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240503/202405031559.2nHyrpwv-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240503/202405031559.2nHyrpwv-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405031559.2nHyrpwv-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    riscv64-linux-ld: section .data LMA [00000000012ee000,000000000215c197] overlaps section .text LMA [00000000000b7734,0000000002b4b903]
>    riscv64-linux-ld: section .data..percpu LMA [00000000031e8000,0000000003206a5f] overlaps section .rodata LMA [0000000002b4db00,000000000326a2ad]
>    riscv64-linux-ld: section .init.pi.text VMA [ffffffff82b4b904,ffffffff82b4da37] overlaps section .data VMA [ffffffff82000000,ffffffff82e6e197]
>    riscv64-linux-ld: section .got VMA [ffffffff82e6e198,ffffffff82e6e1a7] overlaps section .rodata VMA [ffffffff82b4db00,ffffffff8326a2ad]
>    riscv64-linux-ld: section .init.pi.rodata.str1.8 VMA [ffffffff8326a2b0,ffffffff8326a332] overlaps section .bss VMA [ffffffff82f61000,ffffffff83ef965f]
>    block/genhd.o: in function `bdev_nr_sectors':
> >> include/linux/blkdev.h:733:(.text+0x260): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR1'
>    block/genhd.o: in function `genhd_device_init':
> >> block/genhd.c:890:(.init.text+0xa): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR1'
>    block/early-lookup.o: in function `devt_from_partuuid':
>    block/early-lookup.c:71:(.init.text+0x188): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against symbol `block_class' defined in .rodata section in block/genhd.o
>    drivers/clk/clk.o: in function `of_clk_src_onecell_get':
>    drivers/clk/clk.c:4975:(.text+0x5bac): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR3'
>    drivers/clk/clk.o: in function `trace_clk_unprepare':
>    include/trace/events/clk.h:74:(.init.text+0x5b4): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR3'
>    drivers/base/core.o: in function `memalloc_flags_restore':
>    include/linux/sched/mm.h:355:(.text+0x46d6): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against symbol `block_class' defined in .rodata section in block/genhd.o
>    drivers/base/devtmpfs.o: in function `devtmpfs_create_node':
>    drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:131:(.text+0x98a): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against symbol `block_class' defined in .rodata section in block/genhd.o
>    drivers/base/devtmpfs.o: in function `dev_mynode':
>    drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:295:(.text.unlikely+0x1a0): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against symbol `block_class' defined in .rodata section in block/genhd.o
>    block/blk-mq-tag.o: in function `kmalloc_node_noprof':
>    include/linux/slab.h:677:(.text+0x4ace): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR1'
>    block/blk-stat.o: in function `rcu_read_unlock':
>    include/linux/rcupdate.h:868:(.text+0x127e): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR2'
>    block/blk-mq-sysfs.o: in function `blk_mq_hw_sysfs_nr_reserved_tags_show':
>    block/blk-mq-sysfs.c:79:(.text+0x52): additional relocation overflows omitted from the output

These errors are the same as I mentioned here
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202404211031.J6l2AfJk-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/. These
all seem to be false positives. Is this just spam from the bot?

Best

-- 

Joel Granados

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux