Re: [PATCH v1] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Test pmd_leaf() behavior with pmd_mkinvalid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Test pmd_leaf() behavior with pmd_mkinvalid()
From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 15:10:43 +0200
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240501144439.1389048-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <20240501144439.1389048-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 01.05.24 16:44, Ryan Roberts wrote:

An invalidated pmd should still cause pmd_leaf() to return true. Let's
test for that to ensure all arches remain consistent.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>


Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb

References:
- [PATCH v1] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Test pmd_leaf() behavior with pmd_mkinvalid()
  - From: Ryan Roberts

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Fix race between __split_huge_pmd_locked() and GUP-fast
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Fix race between __split_huge_pmd_locked() and GUP-fast
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Test pmd_leaf() behavior with pmd_mkinvalid()
Next by thread: [linux-next:master 9762/10134] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v7_0.c:235: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'job' not described in 'sdma_v7_0_ring_emit_ib'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux