Re: [PATCH v1] selftests: mm: gup_longterm: test unsharing logic when R/O pinning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:15:08PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> In our FOLL_LONGTERM tests, we prefault the page tables for the GUP-fast
> test cases to be able to find a PTE and exercise the "longterm pinning
> allowed" logic on the GUP-fast path where possible.
> 
> For now, we always prefault the page tables writable, resulting in PTEs
> that are writable.
> 
> Let's cover more cases to also test if our unsharing logic works as
> expected (and is able to make progress when there is nothing to unshare)
> by mprotect'ing the range R/O when R/O-pinning, so we don't get PTEs
> that are writable.
> 
> This change would have found an issue introduced by commit a12083d721d7
> ("mm/gup: handle hugepd for follow_page()"), whereby R/O pinning was not
> able to make progress in all cases, because unsharing logic was not
> provided with the VMA to decide at some point that long-term R/O pinning
> a !anon page is fine.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux