Kairui Song <ryncsn@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > This is based on latest mm-unstable. Patch 1/12 might not be needed if > f2fs converted .readahead to use folio, I included it for easier test > and review. > > Currently we use one swap_address_space for every 64M chunk to reduce lock > contention, this is like having a set of smaller swap files inside one > big swap file. I would rather to say, " this is like having a set of smaller files inside a swap device. " To avoid possible confusing in this series. I suggest to avoid to say "swap file". Instead, we can use "swap device". [snip] -- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
