Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] memcg: reduce memory for the lruvec and memcg stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:35:38AM -0700, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:37 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
[...]
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int memcg_stat_items[] = {
> > +       MEMCG_SWAP,
> > +       MEMCG_SOCK,
> > +       MEMCG_PERCPU_B,
> > +       MEMCG_VMALLOC,
> > +       MEMCG_KMEM,
> > +       MEMCG_ZSWAP_B,
> > +       MEMCG_ZSWAPPED,
> > +};
> 
> Unsigned for these? All the values are positive now, but I don't think
> we'll get a build warning if a negative one ever got added, just a
> crash or corruption. BUG_ON in init_memcg_stats if a
> memcg_stat_items[i] < 0?

We are depending on NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS to tell the number of elements
for vmstats. So, I think there is an implicit assumption that there are
no negative enums in enum node_stat_item. So, if we want to verify those
assumptions then we should be adding such warnings/build-bugs in vmstat
first.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux