On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 09:35:25AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: >On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:19:22AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >> In stead of add 129th memory block at the last position, let's try all >> possible position. > >Why do you insist on changing the existing test rather than adding a new >one? > Sounds there is some misunderstanding between us. I am not sure about your idea at first, so I sent a draft to confirm with you. Then I came up with another version which could trigger the overlap bug. You mentioned to keep both and not objection to the first draft, which is the same as this one, I thought this is what you expect. Well, I will add a new one next round. Do you have some suggestion on the function name? memblock_reserve_many_all_position_check ? >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 121 ++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > > >-- >Sincerely yours, >Mike. -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
