On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:37 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At the moment, the amount of memory allocated for stats related structs > in the mem_cgroup corresponds to the size of enum node_stat_item. > However not all fields in enum node_stat_item has corresponding memcg > stats. So, let's use indirection mechanism similar to the one used for > memcg vmstats management. Just curious, does the indirection table cause any noticeable performance impact? My guess is no, but the update paths are usually very performance sensitive. I guess lkp will shout at us if there are any noticeable regressions.
