Re: [PATCH v4] mm/rmap: do not add fully unmapped large folio to deferred split list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:26 AM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > @@ -1553,9 +1557,9 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_remove_rmap(struct folio *folio,
> >                    * page of the folio is unmapped and at least one page
> >                    * is still mapped.
> >                    */
> > -               if (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_anon(folio))
> > -                       if (level == RMAP_LEVEL_PTE || nr < nr_pmdmapped)
> > -                               deferred_split_folio(folio);
> > +               if (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_anon(folio) &&
> > +                   list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list) && partially_mapped)
> > +                       deferred_split_folio(folio);
>
> And now I realize that we can then even drop the folio_test_large(folio)
> check here!

Good idea. This is more understandable.

>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux