Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: add per-order mTHP split counters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Lance,

On 2024/4/24 21:51, Lance Yang wrote:

At present, the split counters in THP statistics no longer include
PTE-mapped mTHP. Therefore, this commit introduces per-order mTHP split
counters to monitor the frequency of mTHP splits. This will assist
developers in better analyzing and optimizing system performance.

/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-<size>/stats
         split_page
         split_page_failed
         deferred_split_page

Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/huge_mm.h |  3 +++
  mm/huge_memory.c        | 14 ++++++++++++--
  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 56c7ea73090b..7b9c6590e1f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -272,6 +272,9 @@ enum mthp_stat_item {
  	MTHP_STAT_ANON_FAULT_FALLBACK_CHARGE,
  	MTHP_STAT_ANON_SWPOUT,
  	MTHP_STAT_ANON_SWPOUT_FALLBACK,
+	MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_PAGE,
+	MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED,
+	MTHP_STAT_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE,
  	__MTHP_STAT_COUNT
  };
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 055df5aac7c3..52db888e47a6 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -557,6 +557,9 @@ DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(anon_fault_fallback, MTHP_STAT_ANON_FAULT_FALLBACK);
  DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(anon_fault_fallback_charge, MTHP_STAT_ANON_FAULT_FALLBACK_CHARGE);
  DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(anon_swpout, MTHP_STAT_ANON_SWPOUT);
  DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(anon_swpout_fallback, MTHP_STAT_ANON_SWPOUT_FALLBACK);
+DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(split_page, MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_PAGE);
+DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(split_page_failed, MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
+DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(deferred_split_page, MTHP_STAT_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
static struct attribute *stats_attrs[] = {
  	&anon_fault_alloc_attr.attr,
@@ -564,6 +567,9 @@ static struct attribute *stats_attrs[] = {
  	&anon_fault_fallback_charge_attr.attr,
  	&anon_swpout_attr.attr,
  	&anon_swpout_fallback_attr.attr,
+	&split_page_attr.attr,
+	&split_page_failed_attr.attr,
+	&deferred_split_page_attr.attr,
  	NULL,
  };
@@ -3083,7 +3089,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
  	XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index, new_order);
  	struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
  	struct address_space *mapping = NULL;
-	bool is_thp = folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio);
+	int order = folio_order(folio);
  	int extra_pins, ret;
  	pgoff_t end;
  	bool is_hzp;
@@ -3262,8 +3268,10 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
  		i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
  out:
  	xas_destroy(&xas);
-	if (is_thp)
+	if (order >= HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)
  		count_vm_event(!ret ? THP_SPLIT_PAGE : THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
+	count_mthp_stat(order, !ret ? MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_PAGE :
+				      MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
  	return ret;
  }
@@ -3327,6 +3335,8 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
  	if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
  		if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
  			count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
+		count_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio),
+				MTHP_STAT_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
  		list_add_tail(&folio->_deferred_list, &ds_queue->split_queue);
  		ds_queue->split_queue_len++;
  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG

My opinion can be ignored :). Would it be better to modify the deferred_split_folio
function as follows? I'm not sure.

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 055df5aac7c3..e8562e8630b1 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3299,12 +3299,13 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio) struct mem_cgroup *memcg = folio_memcg(folio); #endif unsigned long flags; + int order = folio_order(folio); /* * Order 1 folios have no space for a deferred list, but we also * won't waste much memory by not adding them to the deferred list. */ - if (folio_order(folio) <= 1) + if (order <= 1) return; /* @@ -3325,8 +3326,9 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio) spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) { - if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) + if (order >= HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE); + count_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE); list_add_tail(&folio->_deferred_list, &ds_queue->split_queue); ds_queue->split_queue_len++; #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG thanks,
bang





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux