Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: introduce per-order mTHP split counters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.04.24 17:20, Ryan Roberts wrote:
On 24/04/2024 16:00, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 24.04.24 15:51, Lance Yang wrote:
Hi all,

At present, the split counters in THP statistics no longer include
PTE-mapped mTHP. Therefore, we want to introduce per-order mTHP split
counters to monitor the frequency of mTHP splits. This will assist
developers in better analyzing and optimizing system performance.

/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-<size>/stats
          split_page
          split_page_failed
          deferred_split_page

Thanks,
Lance
---

Lance Yang (2):
   mm: add per-order mTHP split counters
   mm: add docs for per-order mTHP split counters

   Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst | 16 ----------------

We really have to start documenting these, and what the sementics are.

I think the diffstat is backwards; the series definitely adds more lines than it
removes. And patch 2 is adding 16 lines of docs, not removing them. How are you
generating this? `git format-patch` should do it correctly for you.


E.g., is split_page_failed contained in split_page? Is deferred_split_page
contained in split_page?

But also: just don't call it "split_page". Drop the "_page".

split
split_failed
split_deferred

I guess we are back in "should we be consistent with the existing vmstats"
territory, which uses split_page/split_page_failed/deferred_split_page


Yeah, "thp_split_page" really is odd "transparent huge page split page".

But here, I agree that dropping _page is nicer.
Right; we also shouldn't call it "thp_split_page" here :)

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux