On 22/04/2024 10:33, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 19.04.24 09:43, Ryan Roberts wrote: >> Previously soft-dirty was unconditionally exiting with success, even if >> one of it's testcases failed. Let's fix that so that failure can be >> reported to automated systems properly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c >> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c >> index 7dbfa53d93a0..bdfa5d085f00 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c >> @@ -209,5 +209,5 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) >> >> close(pagemap_fd); >> >> - return ksft_exit_pass(); >> + ksft_finished(); >> } >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> > > Guess that makes sense independent of all the other stuff? Yes definitely. What's the process here? Do I need to re-post as a stand-alone patch? Or perhaps, Shuah, you could take this into your tree as is? > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks!
