On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 14:23 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > It is not yet clear to me how and why your code converges. > > I don't think it does.. but since the scheduler interaction is fairly > weak it doesn't matter too much from that pov. > That is,.. it slowly moves along with the cpu usage, only if there's a lot of remote memory allocations (memory pressure) things get funny. It'll try and rotate all tasks around a bit trying, but there's no good solution for a memory hole on one node and a cpu hole on another, you're going to have to take the remote hits. Again.. what do we want it to do? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href