[PATCH 2/3] mm/hugetlb: Fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is a recent report on UFFDIO_COPY over hugetlb:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@xxxxxxxxxx/

350:	lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);

Should be an issue in hugetlb but triggered in an userfault context, where
it goes into the unlikely path where two threads modifying the resv map
together.  Mike has a fix in that path for resv uncharge but it looks like
the locking criteria was overlooked: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd()
will update the cgroup pointer, so it requires to be called with the lock
held.

Looks like a stable material, so have it copied.

Reported-by: syzbot+4b8077a5fccc61c385a1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 79aa925bf239 ("hugetlb_cgroup: fix reservation accounting")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 26ab9dfc7d63..3158a55ce567 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3247,9 +3247,12 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 		rsv_adjust = hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
 		hugetlb_acct_memory(h, -rsv_adjust);
-		if (deferred_reserve)
+		if (deferred_reserve) {
+			spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
 			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(hstate_index(h),
 					pages_per_huge_page(h), folio);
+			spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (!memcg_charge_ret)
-- 
2.44.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux