On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:19:42PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: >On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 12:45:27AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >> After previous change, we may double the array based on the position of >> the new range. >> >> Let's make sure the 129th memory block would double the size correctly >> at all possible position. > >Rather than rewrite an existing test, just add a new one. Ok, will add a new one for this. >Besides, it would be more interesting to test additions to >memblock.reserved and a mix of memblock_add() and memblock_reserve() that >will require resizing the memblock arrays. I don't get this very clearly. Would you mind give more hint? > >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > >-- >Sincerely yours, >Mike. -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
