Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] rust: add abstraction for `struct page`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 3:15 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Adds a new struct called `Page` that wraps a pointer to `struct page`.
> This struct is assumed to hold ownership over the page, so that Rust
> code can allocate and manage pages directly.
>
> The page type has various methods for reading and writing into the page.
> These methods will temporarily map the page to allow the operation. All
> of these methods use a helper that takes an offset and length, performs
> bounds checks, and returns a pointer to the given offset in the page.
>
> This patch only adds support for pages of order zero, as that is all
> Rust Binder needs. However, it is written to make it easy to add support
> for higher-order pages in the future. To do that, you would add a const
> generic parameter to `Page` that specifies the order. Most of the
> methods do not need to be adjusted, as the logic for dealing with
> mapping multiple pages at once can be isolated to just the
> `with_pointer_into_page` method.
>
> Rust Binder needs to manage pages directly as that is how transactions
> are delivered: Each process has an mmap'd region for incoming
> transactions. When an incoming transaction arrives, the Binder driver
> will choose a region in the mmap, allocate and map the relevant pages
> manually, and copy the incoming transaction directly into the page. This
> architecture allows the driver to copy transactions directly from the
> address space of one process to another, without an intermediate copy
> to a kernel buffer.
>
> This code is based on Wedson's page abstractions from the old rust
> branch, but it has been modified by Alice by removing the incomplete
> support for higher-order pages, by introducing the `with_*` helpers
> to consolidate the bounds checking logic into a single place, and by
> introducing gfp flags.
>
> Co-developed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>

I have a couple questions about naming, and think an example would be
good for the functions that are trickier to use correctly. But I
wouldn't block on this, implementation looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@xxxxxxxxx>

> +++ b/rust/kernel/page.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! Kernel page allocation and management.
> +
> +use crate::{bindings, error::code::*, error::Result, uaccess::UserSliceReader};
> +use core::{
> +    alloc::AllocError,
> +    ptr::{self, NonNull},
> +};
> +
> +/// A bitwise shift for the page size.
> +pub const PAGE_SHIFT: usize = bindings::PAGE_SHIFT as usize;
> +
> +/// The number of bytes in a page.
> +pub const PAGE_SIZE: usize = bindings::PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> +/// A bitmask that gives the page containing a given address.
> +pub const PAGE_MASK: usize = !(PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> +/// Flags for the "get free page" function that underlies all memory allocations.
> +pub mod flags {
> +    /// gfp flags.

Uppercase acronym, maybe with a description:

    GFP (Get Free Page) flags.

> +    #[allow(non_camel_case_types)]
> +    pub type gfp_t = bindings::gfp_t;

Why not GfpFlags, do we do this elsewhere?

> +    /// `GFP_KERNEL` is typical for kernel-internal allocations. The caller requires `ZONE_NORMAL`
> +    /// or a lower zone for direct access but can direct reclaim.
> +    pub const GFP_KERNEL: gfp_t = bindings::GFP_KERNEL;
> +    /// `GFP_ZERO` returns a zeroed page on success.
> +    pub const __GFP_ZERO: gfp_t = bindings::__GFP_ZERO;
> +    /// `GFP_HIGHMEM` indicates that the allocated memory may be located in high memory.
> +    pub const __GFP_HIGHMEM: gfp_t = bindings::__GFP_HIGHMEM;

It feels a bit weird to have dunder constants on the rust side that
aren't also `#[doc(hidden)]` or just nonpublic. Makes me think they
are an implementation detail or not really meant to be used - could
you update the docs if this is the case?

> +
> +impl Page {
> +    /// Allocates a new page.

Could you add a small example here?

> +    pub fn alloc_page(gfp_flags: flags::gfp_t) -> Result<Self, AllocError> {
> [...]
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Returns a raw pointer to the page.

Could you add a note about how the pointer needs to be used correctly,
if it is for anything more than interfacing with kernel APIs?

> +    pub fn as_ptr(&self) -> *mut bindings::page {
> +        self.page.as_ptr()
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Runs a piece of code with this page mapped to an address.
> +    ///
> +    /// The page is unmapped when this call returns.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Using the raw pointer
> +    ///
> +    /// It is up to the caller to use the provided raw pointer correctly. The pointer is valid for
> +    /// `PAGE_SIZE` bytes and for the duration in which the closure is called. The pointer might
> +    /// only be mapped on the current thread, and when that is the case, dereferencing it on other
> +    /// threads is UB. Other than that, the usual rules for dereferencing a raw pointer apply: don't
> +    /// cause data races, the memory may be uninitialized, and so on.
> +    ///
> +    /// If multiple threads map the same page at the same time, then they may reference with
> +    /// different addresses. However, even if the addresses are different, the underlying memory is
> +    /// still the same for these purposes (e.g., it's still a data race if they both write to the
> +    /// same underlying byte at the same time).
> +    fn with_page_mapped<T>(&self, f: impl FnOnce(*mut u8) -> T) -> T {
> [...]
> +    }

Could you add an example of how to use this correctly?

> +    /// Runs a piece of code with a raw pointer to a slice of this page, with bounds checking.
> +    ///
> +    /// If `f` is called, then it will be called with a pointer that points at `off` bytes into the
> +    /// page, and the pointer will be valid for at least `len` bytes. The pointer is only valid on
> +    /// this task, as this method uses a local mapping.
> +    ///
> +    /// If `off` and `len` refers to a region outside of this page, then this method returns
> +    /// `EINVAL` and does not call `f`.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Using the raw pointer
> +    ///
> +    /// It is up to the caller to use the provided raw pointer correctly. The pointer is valid for
> +    /// `len` bytes and for the duration in which the closure is called. The pointer might only be
> +    /// mapped on the current thread, and when that is the case, dereferencing it on other threads
> +    /// is UB. Other than that, the usual rules for dereferencing a raw pointer apply: don't cause
> +    /// data races, the memory may be uninitialized, and so on.
> +    ///
> +    /// If multiple threads map the same page at the same time, then they may reference with
> +    /// different addresses. However, even if the addresses are different, the underlying memory is
> +    /// still the same for these purposes (e.g., it's still a data race if they both write to the
> +    /// same underlying byte at the same time).

This could probably also use an example. A note about how to select
between with_pointer_into_page and with_page_mapped would also be nice
to guide usage, e.g. "prefer with_pointer_into_page for all cases
except when..."

> +    fn with_pointer_into_page<T>(
> +        &self,
> +        off: usize,
> +        len: usize,
> +        f: impl FnOnce(*mut u8) -> Result<T>,
> +    ) -> Result<T> {
> [...]
> +    /// Maps the page and zeroes the given slice.
> +    ///
> +    /// This method will perform bounds checks on the page offset. If `offset .. offset+len` goes
> +    /// outside ot the page, then this call returns `EINVAL`.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// Callers must ensure that this call does not race with a read or write to the same page that
> +    /// overlaps with this write.
> +    pub unsafe fn fill_zero(&self, offset: usize, len: usize) -> Result {
> +        self.with_pointer_into_page(offset, len, move |dst| {
> +            // SAFETY: If `with_pointer_into_page` calls into this closure, then it has performed a
> +            // bounds check and guarantees that `dst` is valid for `len` bytes.
> +            //
> +            // There caller guarantees that there is no data race.
> +            unsafe { ptr::write_bytes(dst, 0u8, len) };
> +            Ok(())
> +        })
> +    }

Could this be named `fill_zero_raw` to leave room for a safe
`fill_zero(&mut self, ...)`?

> +    /// Copies data from userspace into this page.
> +    ///
> +    /// This method will perform bounds checks on the page offset. If `offset .. offset+len` goes
> +    /// outside ot the page, then this call returns `EINVAL`.
> +    ///
> +    /// Like the other `UserSliceReader` methods, data races are allowed on the userspace address.
> +    /// However, they are not allowed on the page you are copying into.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// Callers must ensure that this call does not race with a read or write to the same page that
> +    /// overlaps with this write.
> +    pub unsafe fn copy_from_user_slice(
> +        &self,
> +        reader: &mut UserSliceReader,
> +        offset: usize,
> +        len: usize,
> +    ) -> Result {
> +        self.with_pointer_into_page(offset, len, move |dst| {
> +            // SAFETY: If `with_pointer_into_page` calls into this closure, then it has performed a
> +            // bounds check and guarantees that `dst` is valid for `len` bytes. Furthermore, we have
> +            // exclusive access to the slice since the caller guarantees that there are no races.
> +            reader.read_raw(unsafe { core::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(dst.cast(), len) })
> +        })
> +    }
> +}

Same as above, `copy_from_user_slice_raw` would leave room for a safe API.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux