Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: swap: make should_try_to_free_swap() support large-folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Chuanhua Han <hanchuanhua@xxxxxxxx>
>
> The function should_try_to_free_swap() operates under the assumption that
> swap-in always occurs at the normal page granularity, i.e., folio_nr_pages
                                                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

nits: folio_nr_pages() is better for understanding.

Otherwise, LGTM, Thanks!

Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>

> = 1. However, in reality, for large folios, add_to_swap_cache() will
> invoke folio_ref_add(folio, nr). To accommodate large folio swap-in,
> this patch eliminates this assumption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <hanchuanhua@xxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 78422d1c7381..2702d449880e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3856,7 +3856,7 @@ static inline bool should_try_to_free_swap(struct folio *folio,
>  	 * reference only in case it's likely that we'll be the exlusive user.
>  	 */
>  	return (fault_flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && !folio_test_ksm(folio) &&
> -		folio_ref_count(folio) == 2;
> +		folio_ref_count(folio) == (1 + folio_nr_pages(folio));
>  }
>  
>  static vm_fault_t pte_marker_clear(struct vm_fault *vmf)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux