On 4/12/24 4:42 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:46:23 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11.04.24 13:42, Alex Shi wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 4/11/24 3:51 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 11.04.24 08:17, alexs@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>> From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> As we are removing get_ksm_page_flags(), make the flags match the new >>>>> function name. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> s/get_ksm_page_flags()/get_ksm_page_flags/ in title, otherwise LGTM. >>>> >>> >>> Uh, for this trivial issue, do I need to sent a new version? or left to maintainer for a quick fix? >> >> I'm sure Andrew can fix that up :) > > He indeed can. Although he prefers foo() to foo. Those two characters > have a good information-per-byte ratio. > > Also I added Alex's Signed-off-by to this. > > (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other > person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified > it. > Thanks a lot for you and all the info! Best regards!
