Re: [PATCH] mm: Always sanity check anon_vma first for per-vma locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:34:44AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
>    If the answer is yes, I'd say please provide some document patch to
>    support such behavior, you can stop my patch from getting merged now,
>    but it's never clear whether someone else will see this and post it
>    again.  If it wasn't obviously to Suren who introduced per-vma lock [1],
>    then I won't be surprised it's unknown to most developers on the list.

Anyone touching this path should have a good idea about what is and is
not the common case.  Your confidence greatly exceeded your ability
here.  I will not be submitting such a patch.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux