Re: [PATCH net-next v9 7/9] libeth: add Rx buffer management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:54:24 -0700

> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:36:13 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> Which tree this should go through? Should I include this patch to this
>> series with libeth or it's better to push this through kees/linux and
>> then pull to net-next?
> 
> I think doc tree is a strong candidate, or at least we should not
> merge without consulting Jon. Please post and we'll figure it out.

Can this series go simultaneously or it needs to wait for the fix first?

> 
> The question someone may ask, however, is whether it causes new
> warnings to appear?

I tested `make W=12 KDOCFLAGS=-Wall all` yesterday and haven't noticed
any new issues, although expected them.

Thanks,
Olek




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux