Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: Inline shmem_is_huge() for disabled transparent hugepages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 02:34:35PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.04.24 17:54, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> > In order to  minimize code size (CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y),
> > compiler might choose to make a regular function call (out-of-line) for
> > shmem_is_huge() instead of inlining it. When transparent hugepages are
> > disabled (CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=n), it can cause compilation
> > error.
> > 
> > mm/shmem.c: In function ‘shmem_getattr’:
> > ./include/linux/huge_mm.h:383:27: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG’
> >    383 | #define HPAGE_PMD_SIZE ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; })
> >        |                           ^~~~~~~~~
> > mm/shmem.c:1148:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘HPAGE_PMD_SIZE’
> >   1148 |                 stat->blksize = HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> > 
> > To prevent the possible error, always inline shmem_is_huge() when
> > transparent hugepages are disabled.
> > 
> 
> Do you know which commit introduced that?
Hi David,

Currently with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y and expirementing with
-fPIC kernel compiler option, I could see this error on s390.

However, default kernel compiler options doesnt end up with the above
pattern right now.

I think, shmem_is_huge() for disabled transparent hugepages comes from:
Commit 5e6e5a12a44c ("huge tmpfs: shmem_is_huge(vma, inode, index)")

However, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE macros for !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
originates from:
Commit d8c37c480678 ("thp: add HPAGE_PMD_* definitions for
!CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE")

Thanks,
Sumanth




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux