Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: Fix hugetlb mem size calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:04:00PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
> > index c2c542fe7b17..b1b78e45d613 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
> > @@ -152,9 +152,13 @@ done < /proc/meminfo
> >  # both of these requirements into account and attempt to increase
> >  # number of huge pages available.
> >  nr_cpus=$(nproc)
> > -hpgsize_MB=$((hpgsize_KB / 1024))
> > -half_ufd_size_MB=$((((nr_cpus * hpgsize_MB + 127) / 128) * 128))
> 
> Removing this has broken the uffd-stress "hugetlb" and "hugetlb-private" tests
> (further down the file), which rely on $half_ufd_size_MB. Now that this is not
> defined, they are called with too few params:

Those FAILs can be burried in some other libc mismatch issues for me so I
overlooked.. My apologies.

I'll send a fixup soon, thank you Ryan!

-- 
Peter Xu





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux