> > On 4/3/24 2:37 AM, Song, Xiongwei wrote: > >> > >> > >> It could be tempting to use >= instead of > to achieve the same effect but > >> that would have unintended performance effects that would best be evaluated > >> separately. > > > > I can run a test to measure Amean changes. But in terms of x86 assembly, there > > should not be extra instructions with ">=". > > > > Did a simple test, for ">=" it uses "jle" instruction, while "jl" instruction is used for ">". > > No more instructions involved. So there should not be performance effects on x86. > > Right, I didn't mean the code of the test, but how the difference of the > comparison affects how many cpu partial slabs would be put on the cpu > partial list here. Got it. Will do measurement for it. Thanks, Xiongwei
