Hi All,
This patchset adds support for lazyfreeing multi-size THP (mTHP) without
needing to first split the large folio via split_folio(). However, we
still need to split a large folio that is not fully mapped within the
target range.
If a large folio is locked or shared, or if we fail to split it, we just
leave it in place and advance to the next PTE in the range. But note that
the behavior is changed; previously, any failure of this sort would cause
the entire operation to give up. As large folios become more common,
sticking to the old way could result in wasted opportunities.
Performance Testing
===================
On an Intel I5 CPU, lazyfreeing a 1GiB VMA backed by PTE-mapped folios of
the same size results in the following runtimes for madvise(MADV_FREE)
in seconds (shorter is better):
Folio Size | Old | New | Change
------------------------------------------
4KiB | 0.590251 | 0.590259 | 0%
16KiB | 2.990447 | 0.185655 | -94%
32KiB | 2.547831 | 0.104870 | -95%
64KiB | 2.457796 | 0.052812 | -97%
128KiB | 2.281034 | 0.032777 | -99%
256KiB | 2.230387 | 0.017496 | -99%
512KiB | 2.189106 | 0.010781 | -99%
1024KiB | 2.183949 | 0.007753 | -99%
2048KiB | 0.002799 | 0.002804 | 0%
---
This patchset applies against mm-unstable (d4cd6840d1dc).
The performance numbers are from v2. I did a quick benchmark run of v4 and
nothing significantly changed.
Changes since v3 [3]
====================
- Rename refresh_full_ptes -> mkold_clean_ptes (per Ryan Roberts)
- Override mkold_clean_ptes() for arm64 to make it faster (per Ryan Roberts)
- Update the changelog
Changes since v2 [2]
====================
- Only skip all the PTEs for nr_pages when the number of batched PTEs matches
nr_pages (per Barry Song)
- Change folio_pte_batch() to consume an optional *any_dirty and *any_young
function (per David Hildenbrand)
- Move the ptep_get_and_clear_full() loop into refresh_full_ptes() (per
David Hildenbrand)
- Follow a similar pattern for madvise_free_pte_range() (per Ryan Roberts)
Changes since v1 [1]
====================
- Update the performance numbers
- Update the changelog (per Ryan Roberts)
- Check the COW folio (per Yin Fengwei)
- Check if we are mapping all subpages (per Barry Song, David Hildenbrand,
Ryan Roberts)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240225123215.86503-1-ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240307061425.21013-1-ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240316102952.39233-1-ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx
Thanks,
Lance
Lance Yang (2):
mm/madvise: introduce mkold_clean_ptes() batch helper
mm/madvise: optimize lazyfreeing with mTHP in madvise_free
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c | 10 +++++
include/linux/pgtable.h | 30 ++++++++++++++
mm/internal.h | 12 +++++-
mm/madvise.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/memory.c | 4 +-
6 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
--
2.33.1
