Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memcg: add res_counter_usage_safe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/04/2012 01:30 PM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>>
> 
> I think asking applications to handle usage > limit case will cause
> trouble and we can keep simple interface by lying here. And,
> applications doesn't need to handle this case.
> 
> From the viewpoint of our enterprise service, it's better to keep
> usage <= limit for avoiding unnecessary, unimportant, troubles.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Kame

One thing to keep in mind, is that usage is already a lie. Mostly
because of batching.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]