On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:10:59 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @Andrew, you properly adjusted the code to remove the > gup_fast_folio_allowed() call instead of the folio_fast_pin_allowed() > call, but > > (1) the commit subject > (2) comment for gup_huge_pd() > > Still mention folio_fast_pin_allowed(). > > The patch "mm/gup: handle hugepd for follow_page()" then moves that > (outdated) comment. OK, thanks, I fixed all that up.
