Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "luto@xxxxxxxxxx" <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, "dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx" <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx" <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bp@xxxxxxxxx" <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "broonie@xxxxxxxxxx" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 03:32:25 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "linux-sgx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-sgx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <e15019f54d26898e4b67b84c331cd52d09427258.camel@kernel.org>
References: <20240326021656.202649-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20240326021656.202649-3-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <D03NWFQM9XP2.1AWMB9VW98Z98@kernel.org> <5b585bcced9b5fffbcfa093ea92a6403ee8ac462.camel@intel.com> <e15019f54d26898e4b67b84c331cd52d09427258.camel@kernel.org>
User-agent: Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 15:15 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> I mean I believe the change itself makes sense, it is just not
> fully documented in the commit message.

Ah, I see. Yes, there could be more background on arch_pick_mmap_layout().

References:
- [PATCH v4 00/14] Cover a guard gap corner case
  - From: Rick Edgecombe
- [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag
  - From: Rick Edgecombe
- Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag
  - From: Jarkko Sakkinen
- Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag
  - From: Edgecombe, Rick P
- Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag
  - From: Jarkko Sakkinen

Prev by Date: Re: summarize all information again at bottom//reply: reply: [PATCH] mm: fix a race scenario in folio_isolate_lru
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/2] Fix selftests/mm build without requiring "make headers"
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]